Allahabad High Court
PUSHPENDRA SINGH AND 6 OTHERSversusCIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) FAST TRACK COURT SHAHJAHANPUR AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- ANISH KUMAR GUPTA
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents. The court noted the lack of any party presence and classified the petition as infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for being infructuous and for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether a petition can be dismissed for want of prosecution and being infructuous when no parties appear before the court
Subjects
- Article 227
- infructuous petition
- civil procedure
- high court dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1921 of 2019
Pushpendra Singh And 6 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Fast Track Court
Shahjahanpur And Another .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Prakash Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sudhir Solanki
Court No. - 34
(SN.20)
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. The instant petition has been listed in infructuous category.
2. None appears on behalf of the parties.
3. In such view of the matter, the instant petition is dismissed as
infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.)
September 30, 2026
Shubham Arya
Digitally signed by :-
SHUBHAM ARYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…