Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JAI PRAKASH NARAYAN @ JAI PRAKASH GAUTAM @ JAI PRAKASHversusADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petition filed by Jai Prakash Narayan et al. before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227 was not pursued by the petitioner. No substantive material was presented, and the petitioner failed to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No merits of the case were examined.

Subjects

  • Article 227
  • petition dismissed
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 207 of 2016


                                    Jai Prakash Narayan @ Jai Prakash Gautam @ Jai
                                    Prakash                                                      .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    Additional District Judge And Another
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Abhilasha Singh, Ashutosh Yadav,
                                                                       Shyam Lal
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : Amitabh Agarwal, Ishwar Chandra
                                                                       Tyagi, J.J.Munir, Syed Fahim Ahmed

                                    Court No. - 35
                                            HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

                                    Case called out in the revised list.

                                    None appears for the petitioner to press the petition.

                                    Sri Syed Fahim Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2 is
                                    present.

                                    Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                             (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
                                    September 18, 2026
                                    RKK/-




Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.