Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. SWARNLATA JAIN AND 3 OTHERSversusSANDEEP GODHA AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The order is appealable under Order 43 Rule 1(t) CPC, but the High Court will not interfere and disposes the petition.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 challenging the appellate court’s order that rejected their application filed under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Civil Procedure Code. The High Court examined whether that order was appealable and whether it warranted interference. It held that the order is indeed appealable under Order 43 Rule 1(t) of the CPC, but the court was not inclined to interfere with the appellate court’s decision. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of, with the petitioners directed to pursue any further remedy available under law. The certified copy of the orders was to be returned to counsel after retaining a xerox copy on record.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order of the appellate court rejecting the application under Order 41 Rule 19 CPC is appealable under Order 43 Rule 1(t) CPC
  • Whether the High Court should interfere with the appellate court’s order in the writ petition under Article 227

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Article 227
  • Order 41 Rule 19
  • Order 43 Rule 1(t)
  • appealability
  • writ petition
  • Civil Procedure Code
  • High Court jurisdiction

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                    MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3410 of 2026

                                    Smt. Swarnlata Jain And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Sandeep Godha And 2 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                       :    Rakesh Pathak
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                       :    Madhav Jain

                                    Court No. - 5
                                                      HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

                                    2. This petition has been filed against the order passed by the Appellate
                                    Court rejecting the application filed by the petitioner under Order 41 Rule
                                    19 CPC.

                                    3. The order impugned is appealable under Order 43 Rule 1(t) CPC.

                                    4. In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter.

                                    5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the
                                    petitioners to avail the remedy, as available to them, under the law.

                                    6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for
                                    the petitioners after retaining xerox copy of the same on record.



                                                                                    (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    Rishabh




Digitally signed by :-
RISHABH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.