Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. KIRTI ALIAS SALONIversusRAHUL KUMAR

Decided

Holding

The High Court directed the Family Court to decide the pending divorce petition expeditiously in accordance with the statutory mandate of Section 21‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Kirti (Saloni), filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Moradabad, to decide her pending divorce case (Case No. 593 of 2023) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the trial had been pending since 2023 and invoked Section 21‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, which mandates that such petitions be concluded within six months of service of notice. The respondent contended that the High Court should not interfere with the trial schedule of the Family Court. The High Court held that the statutory requirement of Section 21‑B necessitates an expeditious disposal and therefore directed the Family Court to decide the matter without unnecessary adjournments, subject to any legal impediment. The petition was subsequently disposed of by the Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can issue a direction under Article 227 to a Family Court to decide a pending divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act within a stipulated time.
  • Whether Section 21‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act obliges the lower court to conclude the trial within six months from service of notice.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • Section 13
  • Section 21-B
  • divorce
  • Family Court
  • expeditious trial
  • Article 227
  • writ petition

Judgment

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3473 of 2026

Smt. Kirti Alias Saloni
                                                             .....Petitioner(s)
                                   Versus

Rahul Kumar
                                                           .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Salma Bano
Counsel for Respondent(s)       : Kuldeep Tripathi, Shiv Shanker Mishra

Court No. - 5
                  HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

1. Heard Ms. Salma Bano, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Kuldeep
Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent and perused the record.

2. The writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :-

     "a) Issue an order or direction to the Principal Judge Family
     Court Moradabad to decide the Case no. 593 of 2023 u/s 13
     Hindu Marriage Act, Smt. Kirti alias Saloni Vs. Rahul Kumar
     with alspecific period."

3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the proceedings
under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act are pending since 2023. It
has been further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that
appropriate directions be issued to the Principal Judge Family Court
Moradabad seized with the proceedings of divorce u/s 13 of the Hindu
Marriage Act to decide the same within a stipulated time or in a time
frame as may be fixed by this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner brought attention of the Court to the
provision of Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act which contemplates
to conclude the trial within six months from the date of service of notice
of petition on the respondents.

5. Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act is quoted as under:

     "21-B. Special provision relating to trial and disposal of
                                                                                                 A227 No. 3473 of 2026
                                                                       2


                                             petitions under the Act.-(1) The trial of a petition under this
                                             Act shall, so far as is practicable consistently with the interest
                                             of justice in respect of the trial, be continued from day to day
                                             until its conclusion unless the Court finds the adjournment of
                                             the trial beyond the following day to be necessary for reasons
                                             to be recorded.

                                             (2) Every petition under this Act shall be tried as expeditiously
                                             as possible and endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial
                                             within six months from the date of service of notice of the
                                             petition on the respondent.

                                             (3) Every appeal under this Act shall be tried as expeditiously
                                             as possible, and endeavour shall be made to conclude the
                                             hearing within three months from the date of service of notice
                                             of appeal on the respondent."

                                    6. In view of the statutory requirement as contemplated under Section 21-
                                    B of the Hindu Marriage Act, no useful purpose would be served in
                                    keeping this petition pending.

                                    7. The Principal Judge Family Court Moradabad is directed to consider
                                    and decide the aforesaid pending proceeding before him, in accordance
                                    with law, expeditiously, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties
                                    concerned as well as an opportunity to lead evidence in support of their
                                    case and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the
                                    parties provided that there is no other legal impediment, keeping in view
                                    the statutory mandate of Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act quoted
                                    above.

                                    8. With these observation, this petition is disposed of.


                                                                                        (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Nitika Sri.




Digitally signed by :-
NITIKA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.