Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KRISHNA GOPAL AND ANOTHERversusSMT. RAJ KUMARI AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

A petition under Article 227 (No. 3705 of 2017) was filed by Krishna Gopal and another against Smt. Raj Kumari and others. The matter was listed as 'Likely to be Infructuous' and no counsel or parties appeared before the court. The bench noted the absence of any representation to press the petition. Consequently, the court held that it could not proceed further. The petition was therefore dismissed for want of prosecution.

Subjects

  • Article 227
  • petition dismissed
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural default

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                    MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3705 of 2017

                                    Krishna Gopal And Another
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Smt. Raj Kumari And 4 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)            :   Anand Prakash Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)            :   Anoop Trivedi (Senior Adv.)

                                    Court No. - 6
                                                        HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.

                                    1. The case is listed under the heading "Likely to be Infructuous".

                                    2. No one has appeared on behalf of the parties to press the petition.

                                    3. In view of the aforesaid, this Court has no other alternative but to
                                    dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.



                                                                                        (Siddharth Nandan,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    S.Prakash




Digitally signed by :-
SHASHI PRAKASH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.