Allahabad High Court
ADITYA SINGHversusRUBI GULAM HAKKANI KHAN
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off/Decided on merits
- Bench
- PANKAJ BHATIA
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Aditya Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against Rubi Gulam Hakkani Khan. The case was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, and counsel for the petitioner, Amit Singh, was recorded. However, on the hearing date, no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no request for adjournment or any other procedural relief was made. The court noted the absence of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the bench dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Alok Mathur on 8 August 2025.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a petition before the High Court?
Subjects
- Article 227
- petition dismissed
- want of prosecution
- procedural default
- High Court
Judgment
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46467
Court No. - 5
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4644 of 2025
Petitioner :- Aditya Singh
Respondent :- Rubi Gulam Hakkani Khan
Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Singh
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Case called out in the revised list.
2. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the
petition nor any request to either adjourn or pass over the case
has been made.
3. The petition is accordingly dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 8.8.2025
RKM.
Digitally signed by :-
RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…