Allahabad High Court
ADITYA KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSRI RAVENDRA PAL SINGH
- Decided
- Bench
- VIKAS BUDHWAR
Holding
A writ petition may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request, provided the court is satisfied and the petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh petition.
Summary
The petitioners, Aditya Kumar and three others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Mr. Karunesh Narayan Tripathi, applied to withdraw the petition while seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The learned Standing Counsel raised no objection to this request. The Court, after considering the application, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and granted the petitioners liberty to re‑file a fresh petition. No merits of the original petition were adjudicated, and the Court directed the return of the certified copy of the impugned order upon submission of a xerox copy.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- Article 227
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5838 of 2026
Aditya Kumar And 3 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Sri Ravendra Pal Singh
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Karunesh Narayan Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Sri Karunesh Narayan Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks
to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty to file afresh.
2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the
aforesaid liberty.
4. Office to return certified copy of the impugned order subject to furnishing
xerox of the same.
May 6, 2026
N.S.Rathour
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…