Allahabad High Court
RADHEY SHYAM PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- VIKAS BUDHWAR
Holding
The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
A petition under Article 227 was filed by Radhey Shyam Pandey against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioner was to be represented by counsel Rahul Sharma and Sikandar Gupta. On the date of hearing, no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court held that a petition cannot proceed without any party or counsel prosecuting it. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition can be entertained in the absence of any representative appearing for the petitioner
Subjects
- Article 227
- petition dismissed
- non prosecution
- High Court
- Allahabad
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5867 of 2026
Radhey Shyam Pandey
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Sharma, Sikandar Gupta
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ekansh Varma, Vishnu Kumar
Srivastava
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Matter has been taken-up in revised call.
2. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
May 6, 2026
Ajeet
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
AJEET KUMAR PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…