Allahabad High Court
DEVBRAT SINGHversusState of UP AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- DEEPAK VERMA
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Devbrat Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petitioner was represented by counsel Raju Ratan Chauhan, while the respondents were represented by G.A. No party appeared before the Court to press the petition. The Court observed that the petition had not been prosecuted. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution?
Subjects
- Article 227
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6241 of 2024
Devbrat Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raju Ratan Chauhan
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 74
HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
1. Case called out in revised list. No one has appeared to press this petition.
2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Deepak Verma,J.)
September 8, 2026
Meenu Singh
Digitally signed by :-
MEENU SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…