Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SEEMA DEVIversusMAMTA DEVI

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is disposed with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Hawali, Bareilly to decide the pending miscellaneous case expeditiously, ensuring due process.

Summary

The petitioner, Seema Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Hawali, Bareilly to decide Miscellaneous Case No. 23 of 2025 involving the respondent, Mamta Devi. The petitioner’s counsel requested an expeditious decision of the pending suit. The High Court observed that keeping the writ petition pending would serve no useful purpose while the underlying case remained unresolved. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the lower court to decide the case promptly, ensuring service of notice, hearing, and opportunity to lead evidence, provided no other legal impediment exists. The order was dated May 5, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court should entertain and grant a writ direction for the lower court to decide a pending miscellaneous suit

Subjects

  • Article 227
  • writ petition
  • civil procedure
  • expeditious disposal
  • jurisdiction of High Court
  • notice
  • hearing

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6257 of 2026

                                    Seema Devi
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus
                                    Mamta Devi
                                                                                                   .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                     :    Sujeet Kumar Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                     :

                                    Court No. - 5
                                                         HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

                                    1. Heard.

                                    2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices
                                    are not being issued to the respondents.

                                    3. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition for a direction to the
                                    Civil Judge (Junior Division) Hawali, Bareilly to decide the Misc. Case No.
                                    23 of 2025 (Seema Devi Versus Mamta Devi and others).

                                    4. Learned counsel prayed that the said suit may be decided, expeditiously.

                                    5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be
                                    served in keeping this petition pending.

                                    6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction
                                    to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Hawali, Bareilly to decide the Misc.
                                    Case No. 23 of 2025 (Seema Devi Versus Mamta Devi and others), in
                                    accordance with law, expeditiously as per roster, after ensuring service of
                                    notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all
                                    the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading
                                    evidence in respect of their case, provided there is no other legal
                                    impediment.

                                    May 5, 2026
                                    Rajesh
                                                                                               (Vikas Budhwar,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
RAJESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.