Allahabad High Court
SIKANDERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petition filed by Sikander under Article 227 was found to have no further prosecution. The court observed that the petitioner had not taken any steps to advance the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No substantive merits of the case were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether a petition under Article 227 can proceed in the absence of prosecution by the petitioner
Subjects
- Article 227
- petition dismissed
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6308 of 2025
Sikander
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Munna Singh Tomar, Pushpendra
Singh Tomar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears for the petitioner to press the petition.
Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
April 23, 2026
RKK/-
Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…