Allahabad High Court
UDAY NATH SINGHversusMOOL CHAND AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- VIKAS BUDHWAR
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioner, Uday Nath Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227. Counsel for the petitioner stated that the petition had become infructuous, and the respondents did not object. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The dismissal was recorded on May 6, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is infructuous and should be dismissed
Subjects
- Article 227
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6331 of 2026
Uday Nath Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Mool Chand And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Triloki Nath
Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
At the very outset, Sri Triloki Nath has made a statement that the petition
has become rendered infructuous.
Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the same.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
May 6, 2026
Ashu
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…