Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

IMRAN ALIversusGRAM PRADHAN GRAM PANCHAYAT CHANDPUR AUDHERA, AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge to decide the temporary injunction application within eight months.

Summary

Petitioner Imran Ali filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Khaga, Fatehpur to decide his application for a temporary injunction in Original Suit No. 240 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the suit required expeditious disposal. The Court observed that since the underlying suit was pending, the writ petition served no useful purpose if kept alive. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the lower court to decide the injunction application within eight months of receiving the certified copy of the order, without unnecessary adjournments. The direction was issued subject to any legal impediment.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to a lower court to decide a temporary injunction application is maintainable.
  • Whether the High Court can impose a time‑bound directive on the lower court for expeditious disposal.

Subjects

  • Article 227
  • writ petition
  • temporary injunction
  • civil procedure
  • expeditious disposal
  • direction to lower court

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                    MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6418 of 2026

                                    Imran Ali
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Gram Pradhan Gram Panchayat Chandpur
                                    Audhera, And 3 Others                                       .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                  :   Girja Shankar Prajapati
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   Azad Rai, C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 5
                                                          HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

                                    1. Heard.

                                    2. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition for a writ, order or
                                    direction to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Khaga, Fatehpur to
                                    decide the application for temporary injunction, filed by the plaintiff-
                                    petitioner in Original Suit No. 240 of 2025 (Imran Ali Versus Gram
                                    Pradhan), pending before it within stipulated time, as may deem fit and
                                    proper by this Hon'ble Court.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the said suit may be
                                    decided, expeditiously.

                                    4. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be
                                    served in keeping this petition pending.

                                    5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction
                                    to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Khaga, Fatehpur to decide the
                                    application for temporary injunction, filed by the plaintiff-petitioner in
                                    Original Suit No. 240 of 2025 (Imran Ali Versus Gram Pradhan), in
                                    accordance with law, expeditiously, within a period of eight months from the
                                    date of presentation of the certified copy of the order without granting
                                    unnecessary adjournments subject to legal impediment.



                                                                                              (Vikas Budhwar,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Vandana




Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.