Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ASHOK TIWARIversusSANTOSH KUMAR KESHARI AND 8 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is disposed with a direction that the pending 6c application be decided expeditiously, with due notice and hearing to all parties.

Summary

Petitioner Ashok Tiwari filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the 6c application filed in his civil suit (No. 1589 of 2024) be decided promptly. The petition was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, with counsel Ashish Srivastava representing the petitioner. The court noted that the civil suit was still pending and that issuing notices to respondents would not serve any useful purpose while the petition remained. Consequently, the court held that the writ petition should be disposed of. It directed that the 6c application be decided expeditiously, ensuring service of notice to all respondents, an opportunity to be heard, and a chance to lead evidence, provided no other legal impediment exists. The petition was therefore disposed with the said direction.

Issues considered

  • What relief, if any, can a High Court grant under Article 227 in a writ petition seeking direction to decide a pending application in a civil suit?
  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed in view of the pending civil suit and the need for expeditious disposal of the application.

Subjects

  • Article 227
  • writ petition
  • civil suit
  • 6c application
  • expeditious disposal
  • jurisdiction of High Court
  • notice and hearing

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                    MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6873 of 2026

                                    Ashok Tiwari
                                                                                                       .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus
                                    Santosh Kumar Keshari And 8 Others
                                                                                                     .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                          :    Ashish Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                          :

                                    Court No. - 5
                                                            HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

                                    1. Heard.

                                    2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices
                                    are not being issued to the respondents.

                                    3. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition for a writ, order or
                                    direction to decide the 6c application filed by plaintiff/petitioner in Civil Suit
                                    No. 1589 of 2024 (Ashok Tiwari Vs. Santosh Kumar Keshari and others)
                                    pending before learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No.14 Prayagraj/
                                    Allahabad, within stipulated time, as may deem fit and proper by this
                                    Hon'ble Court.

                                    4. Learned counsel prayed that the said suit may be decided, expeditiously.

                                    5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be
                                    served in keeping this petition pending.

                                    6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction
                                    to decide the 6c application filed by plaintiff/petitioner in Civil Suit No.
                                    1589 of 2024 (Ashok Tiwari Vs. Santosh Kumar Keshari and others)
                                    pending before learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No.14 Prayagraj/
                                    Allahabad, in accordance with law, expeditiously, after ensuring service of
                                    notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all
                                    the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading
                                    evidence in respect of their case, provided there is no other legal
                                    impediment.

                                    May 18, 2026
                                    Ashu
                                                                                               (Vikas Budhwar,J.)



Digitally signed by :-
ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.