Allahabad High Court
UDAI SINGHversusRAJENDRA SINGH
- Decided
- Bench
- MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners, Udai Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for either party when the matter was called. The court noted the absence of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan, J. on September 8, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can proceed in the absence of any party appearing before the court
Subjects
- Article 227
- writ petition
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 710 of 2020
Udai Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Rajendra Singh
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Sahai
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rama Goel Bansal, Shalini Goel
Court No. - 52
HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
1. List is revised. None appears on behalf of the parties even in the
revised call.
2. The matter is of the year 2020.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)
September 8, 2026
K.N.
Digitally signed by :-
KALP NATH SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…