Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAJENDRA KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusMORADABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as it has become infructuous.

Summary

The petitioners, Rajendra Kumar and three others, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against the Moradabad Development Authority and two other respondents. The petition sought relief from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, Ratnesh Kumar Tiwari, submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered the submission and found no remaining cause of action. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground that it was infructuous. The judgment was delivered by Justice Vikas Budhwar on May 7, 2026.

Subjects

  • Article 227
  • infructuous petition
  • petition dismissed
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • administrative law

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                    MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7458 of 2025

                                    Rajendra Kumar And 3 Others
                                                                                             .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Moradabad Development Authority And 2 Others
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Ratnesh Kumar Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : Dharmendra Singh Chauhan, Krishna
                                                                      Mohan Asthana, Tejasvi Misra

                                    Court No. - 5
                                                          HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

                                    1. Sri Prashant Tiwari, advocate holding brief of Sri Ratnesh Kr. Tiwari,
                                    learned counsel for the petitioners submits the present petition may be
                                    dismissed as the same has become infructuous.

                                    2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become
                                    infructuous.



                                                                                         (Vikas Budhwar,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Vandana




Digitally signed by :-
VANDANA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.