Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAHUL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The application under Section 482 CrPC is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Rahul and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, presumably to quash a criminal proceeding. The matter was listed in the revised court list, but no party appeared before the court. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The Hon'ble Judge observed the lack of prosecution and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the application were considered. The dismissal effectively leaves the underlying criminal proceedings untouched.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when an application under Section 482 CrPC is filed but no party appears before the court?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure
  • Section 482
  • Application dismissal
  • Want of prosecution
  • High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11111 of 2022

                                    Rahul And 2 Others
                                                                                               .....Applicant(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                  .....Opposite
                                                                                                        Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)        : Sunil Singh
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)   : Anamika Singh, G.A., Rahul Singh

                                    Court No. - 74
                                                        HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.

                                    1. Case called out in the revised list. None appears to press this
                                    application.

                                    2. Learned AGA is present.

                                    3. Accordingly, the present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for
                                    want of prosecution.



                                                                                         (Deepak Verma,J.)
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Nisha




Digitally signed by :-
nisha kumari
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.