Allahabad High Court
RAGHVENDRA YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- DEEPAK VERMA
Holding
The application under Section 482 is dismissed as there is no ground for interference with the interim order.
Summary
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking interference with an interim order that had been obtained in the context of a mediation process. The matter had earlier been referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, which reported that the applicants had not complied with a May 22, 2024 order to deposit money, preventing the issuance of notices to the opposite parties. The court noted that the applicants, invoking the possibility of settlement, had already benefited from the interim order and that there was no ground for the High Court to interfere. Consequently, the court found no reason to entertain the application. The application was therefore dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court should interfere with an interim order obtained by the applicants in a mediation proceeding
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- mediation
- interim order
- Section 482
- High Court
- dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15208 of 2024
Raghvendra Yadav And 2 Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jaysingh Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 74
HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
1. Case called out in revised list. No one appeared to press this
application.
2. Record shows that vide order dated 22.05.2024, the matter was referred
to Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Allahabad. As per
Mediation report dated 03.08.2024, the applicants have not complied the
order dated 22.05.2024 with regard to deposition of money, hence the
notices could not be issued to the opposite parties. The matter was
referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre that there is chances of
Mediation.
3. Counsel for the applicant in the garb of chances of settlement between
the parties, got interim order and have enjoyed the same. No interference
is warranted by this Court.
4. The application is, accordingly dismissed.
(Deepak Verma,J.)
May 12, 2026
Meenu Singh
Digitally signed by :-
MEENU SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…