Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SUBHAM SHARMA38versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The applicant Subham Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter was listed for hearing on 21 April 2026, but the applicant failed to appear. On the revised list, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution and ordered that the order be communicated to the lower court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the application under Section 482 can be dismissed for want of prosecution when the applicant fails to appear before the Court

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 482
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • procedural dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • high court

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                       APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1590 of 2022

                                    Subham Sharma38
                                                                                                          .....Applicant(s)
                                                                          Versus
                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                             :     Shashank Tripathi
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                        :     G.A.

                                    Court No. - 82
                                                      HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

                                         1. On 21.04.2026, this Court passed the following order:-

                                               "1. List revised. None appears for the applicant.
                                               2. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
                                               3. Interim order, if any, is vacated.
                                               4. List in ordinary course."

                                         2. Today when the case was taken up in the revised list, none appears to
                                         press this application on behalf of the applicants.

                                         3. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed for want of
                                         prosecution.

                                         4. Office is directed to communicate the order passed by this Court to the
                                         concerned Court below.



                                    May 5, 2026
                                    S.Ali
                                                                                             (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SHAUKAT ALI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.