Allahabad High Court
VINAY PRATAPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- JAI PRAKASH TIWARI
Holding
The application under Section 482 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant Vinay Pratap filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared for the applicant and the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court observed that the application was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it. The interim order, if any, was discharged. The judgment was delivered on April 27, 2026 by Justice Jai Prakash Tiwari.
Issues considered
- Whether the application under Section 482 of the CrPC should be entertained in the absence of prosecution?
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Section 482
- inherent jurisdiction
- application dismissed
- want of prosecution
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16500 of 2017
Vinay Pratap
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prakash Chandra Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Salman Ahmad
Court No. - 84
HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
1. List has been revised. None is present on behalf of the applicant as well
opposite party however, learned AGA for the State is present.
2. The present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
(Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.)
April 27, 2026
S.K./K.K.Patel
Digitally signed by :-
SWEETY KANOJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…