Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SUDARSHAN GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The application under Section 482 is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 19170 of 2019) was filed by Sudarshan Goswami against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The matter remained pending for several years and, when called on, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant. The High Court observed that the application had been pending since 2019 and, in the absence of any prosecution, dismissed it. Consequently, the interim order previously granted was vacated, and the trial court was directed to proceed with the case as per law. The order was to be communicated to the trial court by the Registrar.

Issues considered

  • Whether an application under Section 482 can be entertained when the applicant fails to appear before the court?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 482
  • inherent powers of High Court
  • non‑appearance
  • application dismissed
  • interim order vacated
  • trial court proceedings

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                   APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19170 of 2019

                                    Sudarshan Goswami
                                                                                                   .....Applicant(s)
                                                                        Versus
                                    State Of U.P.And Another
                                                                                                       .....Opposite
                                                                                                             Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                      :   Sanjay Kr. Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                 :   G.A., Ravindra Kumar

                                    Court No. - 83
                                                       HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.

                                    1. Case called on. No one is present on behalf of the applicant, even in the
                                    revised list.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. is present for the State.

                                    3. Since this application is pending since 2019 and no one is present on
                                    behalf of the applicant to press this application, this application is dismissed
                                    for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    5. The Trial Court is at liberty to proceed with the matter as per law.

                                    6. Let this order be communicated to the Trial Court concerned by the
                                    Registrar (Compliance).

                                    September 15, 2026
                                    Vijay
                                                                                             (Chawan Prakash,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
VIJAY KUMAR SAHU
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.