Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAM ASARE SETHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The application under Section 482 is dismissed for want of prosecution, and the interim order is vacated.

Summary

The applicant, Ram Asare Seth, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2266 of 2019) seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. The matter was listed before the High Court, but the applicant failed to appear, even after being listed on the revised list. Counsel for the opposite parties were present. The Court observed that the application had been pending since 2019 and, due to the applicant's non‑appearance, dismissed it for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated, and the trial court was directed to proceed with the case as per law. The order was to be communicated to the trial court by the Registrar.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when an applicant fails to appear for a pending Section 482 application?
  • Can an interim order issued in a Section 482 application be vacated upon dismissal for want of prosecution?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 482
  • inherent powers of High Court
  • non‑appearance
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated
  • trial court proceedings

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                      APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2266 of 2019

                                    Ram Asare Seth
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                    .....Opposite
                                                                                                          Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)               :    Pravin Kumar Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)          :    Ajai Kumar Malviya, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 83
                                                      HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.

                                    1. Case called on. No one is present on behalf of the applicant, even in the
                                    revised list.

                                    2. Learned Counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. are
                                    present.

                                    3. Since this application is pending since 2019 and no one is present on
                                    behalf of the applicant to press this application, this application is
                                    dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    5. The Trial Court is at liberty to proceed with the matter as per law.

                                    6. Let this order be communicated to the Trial Court concerned by the
                                    Registrar (Compliance).



                                                                                          (Chawan Prakash,J.)
                                    September 16, 2026
                                    Vijay




Digitally signed by :-
VIJAY KUMAR SAHU
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.