Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. SHANTI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The applicant, Smt. Shanti Devi, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019. The matter was listed but the applicant failed to appear, and no counsel represented her at the hearing. The opposite party and the State's counsel were present. The court observed that the applicant's non‑appearance indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the application. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The order was directed to be sent to the trial court.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when an applicant fails to appear for a pending application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure
  • Section 482
  • Dismissal for want of prosecution
  • High Court
  • Application

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23156 of 2019

                                    Smt. Shanti Devi
                                                                                               .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 7 Others
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)          : Ashutosh Pandey
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)     : G.A., Ravindra Prakash Srivastava

                                    Court No. - 83
                                                       HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.

                                    1. List has been revised.

                                    2. No one is present for the applicant. However, learned counsel for the
                                    opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State are present.

                                    3. The application is pending since 2019, however no one is present on
                                    behalf of the applicant to press the application.

                                    4. This indicates that the applicant is no longer interested in pursuing the
                                    matter.

                                    5. Accordingly, the application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of
                                    prosecution.

                                    6. Copy of the this order be sent to the Trial Court concerned



                                                                                         (Chawan Prakash,J.)
                                    September 18, 2026
                                    Neetu




Digitally signed by :-
NEETU SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.