Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

THANESHWAR PRASAD DUBEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The application under Section 482 is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The applicants, Thaneshwar Prasad Dubey and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for hearing, but no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicants on the scheduled dates, including the revised call. The opposite party's counsel and the Additional Government Advocate were present. The Court observed that the applicants had failed to prosecute the application despite multiple listings. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force, directing that a copy of the order be sent to the trial court.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when an application under Section 482 is not prosecuted by the applicant despite being listed?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 482
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • procedural dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • high court

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                       APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 26825 of 2021

                                    Thaneshwar Prasad Dubey And Another
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Bala Nath Mishra, Ram Vishal Mishra,
                                                                    Sachin Mishra
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mehul Khare, Rohan Gupta,
                                                                    Saurabh Kesarwani

                                    Court No. - 79
                                                        HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.

                                    1. List revised.

                                    2. None present for applicants even in revised call. However, learned
                                    counsel for opposite party No.2 and learned AGA are present.

                                    3. The record shows that on the previous date, i.e., 06.04.2026 no one
                                    appeared on behalf of the applicants. Even today, none has appeared on
                                    behalf of the applicants to press the present application.

                                    4. In view of above, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    4. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial court forthwith.



                                                                                           (Chawan Prakash,J.)
                                    May 12, 2026
                                    Md Faisal




Digitally signed by :-
MOHD FAISAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.