Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. RAKHI @ REKHA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The application under Section 482 is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Smt. Rakhi @ Rekha and two others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to intervene in a criminal proceeding. The matter was listed but no counsel for either side appeared, although the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court observed that the petitioners appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the application, which had remained pending for several years. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution, deeming further continuation purposeless. The interim order previously granted was vacated, and the order was directed to be communicated to the trial court.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when an application under Section 482 remains pending for an extended period without any prosecution by the parties?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 482
  • inherent powers of High Court
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated
  • application dismissal

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28079 of 2019

                                    Smt. Rakhi @ Rekha And 2 Others
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Santosh Kumar Shukla
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anvir Singh, G.A., Ghan Shyam Yadav

                                    Court No. - 83
                                                      HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.

                                    1. Case called out in the revised list. None is present on behalf of either of
                                    the parties. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.

                                    2. This application is pending since 2019.

                                    3. It appears that the applicants have lost interest to pursue the case, hence
                                    no useful purpose would be served to keep this application pending.

                                    4. In view of above, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial court forthwith.



                                                                                           (Chawan Prakash,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    Md Faisal




Digitally signed by :-
MOHD FAISAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.