Allahabad High Court
MOHIT SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Holding
The bail application is dismissed because the applicant's counsel did not appear.
Summary
Mohit Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 3014 of 2022) seeking bail. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while counsel for the State of U.P. and another party were present. The court noted the absence of representation for the applicant and consequently dismissed the bail application. The order directed that a copy of the dismissal be sent to the concerned court for further action. No substantive merits of the bail request were considered due to the procedural default.
Issues considered
- Can a bail application under Section 482 proceed in the absence of the applicant's counsel?
- Is the court empowered to dismiss the application solely on the ground of non-appearance?
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- bail
- Section 482
- inherent powers
- non-appearance
- application dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3014 of 2022
Mohit Sharma
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P.And Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kuldeep Singh Chahar, Nagendra
Kumar Pandey, Surjeet Singh Chahar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sujan Singh
Court No. - 82
HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
सूची पुनरीि्षत।
आवेदक की ओर से कोई उपिस्थत नहीं है, िवप्षी सं० 2 के िव्षान अिधव्वा के स्थान पर
उनके सहयोगी िव्षान अिधव्वा ्शी अंकुश यादवएवं िव्षान अपर शासकीय अिधव्वा
उपिस्थत है।
आवेदक की ओर से िकसी के उपिस्थत न होने के कारण, यह अि्षम जमानत आवेदन प्ऴ
अदम पैरवी में िनरस्त िकया जाता है।
कायार्लय को िनदरॏिशत िकया जाता है िक इस आदेश की ्ऺितिलिप संबंिधत/ िवचारण न्यायालय
को अिवलंब ्ऺेिषत करना सुिनि्ात करें।
(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
May 12, 2026
CP.sahani
Digitally signed by :-
CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…