Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

LAL BAHADUR @ BANTU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The application under Section 482 is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Lal Bahadur @ Bantu and two others against the State of U.P. and another. The applicants sought relief, but no counsel appeared on their behalf to press the application. The counsel for the opposite party, Hem Pratap Singh, was present. The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution, indicating that the applicants failed to pursue the matter. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated. The order was dated 9 July 2025.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when an application under Section 482 is not prosecuted by the applicant?
  • Whether the interim order, if any, should continue in force pending the disposition of the application?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 482
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Dismissal for want of prosecution
  • Interim order vacated
  • Inherent powers of High Court

Judgment

                                                                 Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110594

                                        Court No. - 76

                                        Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 30512 of 2024

                                        Applicant :- Lal Bahadur @ Bantu And 2 Others
                                        Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
                                        Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Sharma,Nikhil Mishra,Sudhir
                                        Bharti
                                        Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Hem Pratap Singh

                                        Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.

                                        1. List is revised. None is present on behalf of the applicants
                                        to press the present application. However, Shri Vikrant,
                                        Advocate holding brief of Shri Hem Pratap Singh, learned
                                        counsel for the opposite party is present.

                                        2. The present application is dismissed for want of
                                        prosecution.

                                        3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                        Order Date :- 9.7.2025
                                        SY




Digitally signed by :-
SWETA YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.