Allahabad High Court

PRAVEEN KAUSHIK AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided: 19 April 2026
Bench: GAUTAM CHOWDHARY

Summary

The petitioners Praveen Kaushik and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court (Application No. 3223 of 2022) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The matter was listed before Hon’ble Justice Gautam Chowdhary. Counsel for the petitioners was Abhishek Gupta, while the respondents were represented by Akhilesh Srivastava, G.A., and Saksham Srivastava. The judgment was delivered on 20 April 2026. The judgment text provided is largely incomprehensible and does not disclose the factual background, legal issues, reasoning, or the final order.

Judgment

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                   APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3223 of 2022

Praveen Kaushik And 2 Others
                                                             .....Applicant(s)
                                   Versus

State of U.P. and Another
                                                                .....Opposite
                                                                      Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Abhishek Gupta
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Akhilesh Srivastava, G.A., Saksham
                                Srivastava

Court No. - 82
                 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

1. =O/+ I 9 9O /?9? 482 /oo9o O          m-}- /9 =O/) +}, +?9=?/ 9o
1667 9) 2019        m-}- /?9? 498-, 323 -?o/o?=o = /?9? 3/4 /9O ?-?O/
 ?/?)//, -?)? ;K/?, ?;? ;I? /O +9 /I_/ m/??/ /?}O, K} )o 3, ;I?
?9? +??9- 9_?)/-;-I /O? ?/o 10.11.2021 O ?=yo /K?- ?/? /? 9Im

2. =O/+ O ?=?)       ?/=}? = ?=?)    +9 ??9I/     ?/=}? K 9I)? --?
+}?=;I ? +?9?I;) ?/?m

3. =O/+ O ?=?)      ?/=}? O - K =+K+9?m-, +}?=;I O +?9?I;) 9O
m/?/?;/ )O +?/? ? +?9=?/ /O ;?  9K+  9_O/ +9?/ O /I?) ? I;?9?
9-O 9K = =9 9K+, ?  ?==O)?/ =;K) O +9?m- ;?  9Km ) 9K+K
K 9 m/?/?;/ ?9? /?9? 482 /oo9o O -9- +)I ??} ? /K 9-O y, I
O /M9?) } I /I 9?/I O 9K+K I ?Io-? 9 ?=9)I/-? ? ;) 9)O
I =/-? )9K 9Im 9 }-9 +9 =O/+/ ?-/I}+ O ?==??/- -?= +9 ?=?9
)9K ?/? ? 9-? 9Im -o)I9?9, 9_?) /? +9K} =?/ I ?/}=?9I K 9o 9)O I
?-})? 9 +?9+?/I ?/}=?9I }=IK- I ?-I 9Im

4. 9 }-9 +9, =O/+ O ?=?) ?/=}? ? )I9K/ 9I ? =O/+ K -I -
 +9K} /?/;O /O ?9+M-?9 )9K ?/? /? 9I 9 +I?;9 =O/+ K ?9o-?9 9)O O
/?9 /O 9I 9 9-?/- ?=?9+ m/?/?;/ ?9? =O/+ O ?;?+ /o)?m/ ?}/?
?9I I ? 9-I 9Im 9?;, =O/+ O /?)- =O/) +} +9 ?=?9 9)O O ?;
9-?/- ?=?9+ m/?/?;/ K ?)/? ?9I 9 ?//? ?/m

5. /9? ?9? 9I ? /?))I/ _-/ m/?/?;/ ?9? Satendra Kumar Antil Vs.
Central Bureau of Investigation and another (Special Leave to
                                                                                                A482 No. 3223 of 2022
                                                                     2

                                    Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 O 9+ K /O? ?/o 07-10-2021 ?9? +9;O
                                    9I /?)- 9O-I ?/??-?)/? /O-O y ?)}-??9- ?/? ? I? 9I, 9O +?-M   - 9-?/-
                                    ?=?9+ m/?/?;/ K /?)- /O)O O ?; )O ?==O 9 ?=?9 K ?)/?}- 9)O =?;O
                                    =I/??) ??=/?)K K -??=- ? ?-)?, 9 m/?/?;/ ?9? K ?=?? ?)/? ?9I 9)O
                                    I =/-? )9K 9I, ]/K? /9          +O? I ?-I 9I ? 9-?/- ?=?9+ m/?/?;/
                                    =O/+ O /?)- ?-})? +} K ?)}-??9- 9-O 9// /?))I/ _-/ m/?/?;/
                                    ?9? +9;O 9O ?9I =/ ?/??-?)/?K K o/?) /O 9O?m

                                    6. +9K} ?o+?+/K O 9?-, /9 =O/) +} ?m-/ {+ 9O ?)}-??9- ?/? ?-? 9Im


                                                                                    (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    CP.sahani




Digitally signed by :-
CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…