Allahabad High Court
GULSHAN BEGAMversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
- Bench
- SHREE PRAKASH SINGH
Holding
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Gulshan Begam filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The applicant's counsel, Aditya Vikram Shahi, was absent and no request for adjournment was made. The High Court noted the absence of representation and the lack of any request to continue the proceedings. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application on the ground of want of prosecution. The order was dated 23 April 2025 and signed by the presiding judge.
Issues considered
- Whether the application under Section 482 CrPC can be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's counsel being absent and no adjournment request being filed.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Section 482
- want of prosecution
- application dismissal
- high court procedure
Judgment
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23235
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4233 of 2023
Applicant :- Gulshan Begam
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home
U.P. Lko. And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Aditya Vikram Shahi
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajendra Kumar Verma
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Case has been called out in the revised list.
Neither Shri Aditya Vikram Shahi, learned counsel for the
applicant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf
for adjournment of the case.
As such, the present case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.4.2025
Ashish
Digitally signed by :-
ASHISH MISHRA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…