Allahabad High Court
SATYAM SHANKHVAR AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- DEEPAK VERMA
Holding
The application under Section 482 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Satyam Shankhvar and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Deepak Verma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court observed that the application had not been prosecuted and consequently dismissed it. The dismissal was recorded on May 5, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the application under Section 482 of the CrPC should be entertained in the absence of prosecution?
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- Section 482
- Criminal Procedure Code
- application dismissed
- want of prosecution
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4325 of 2024
Satyam Shankhvar And Another
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 3 Other
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajeev Kumar Saxena
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Abhishek Tiwari, G.A., Ganesh Mani
Court No. - 74
HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
List revised. None appears on behalf of the applicants. Learned AGA for
the State is present.
Present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Deepak Verma,J.)
May 5, 2026
KJ
Digitally signed by :-
KAMARJAHAN ANSARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…