Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

LAXMAN PRASAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Laxman Prasad and others. The applicants' counsel did not appear before the High Court, and the same absence was noted on a prior occasion. The Court observed that no representation was made on behalf of the applicants. Consequently, the application was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order previously granted was vacated, and the trial court was directed to proceed with the matter. The order was to be communicated to the trial court by the Registrar.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court should entertain an application under Section 482 CrPC when the applicants are not represented before the Court?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 482
  • Dismissal for want of prosecution
  • Interim order vacated
  • Trial court proceedings

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 45901 of 2019

                                    Laxman Prasad And 3 Others
                                                                                                   .....Applicant(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                      .....Opposite
                                                                                                            Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Kaushal Kishore Mani, Ram Kirshna
                                                                    Yadav
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Surendra Kumar Chaubey

                                    Court No. - 83
                                                       HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.

                                    1. Case called on. No one is present on behalf of the applicants even in
                                    the revised list.

                                    2. A perusal of order-sheet shows that on earlier occasion also no one was
                                    present on behalf of the applicants.

                                    3. Accordingly, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    5. The trial Court is at liberty to proceed with the matter.

                                    6. Let this order be communicated to the Trial Court concerned by the
                                    Registrar (Compliance).



                                                                                           (Chawan Prakash,J.)
                                    September 15, 2026
                                    Vijay




Digitally signed by :-
VIJAY KUMAR SAHU
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.