Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SUMIT JAISWAL and OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME. LKO and OTHERS

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The Court held that in the absence of the applicants and without any request for adjournment, the application under Section 482 must be dismissed for non‑prosecution and any interim order vacated.

Summary

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Sumit Jaiswal and others seeking relief against the State of U.P. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but none of the applicants appeared and no request for adjournment was made. The learned Additional Government Advocate was the only counsel present. The Court observed that the absence of the applicants amounted to non‑prosecution of the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application and vacated any interim order that might have been in force.

Issues considered

  • Whether an application under Section 482 can be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the non‑appearance of the applicants?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 482
  • inherent powers
  • non‑prosecution
  • interim order
  • application dismissal

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                      APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5770 of 2021

                                     Sumit Jaiswal And Others
                                                                                               .....Applicant(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home. Lko
                                     And Others                                                   .....Opposite
                                                                                                        Party(s)

                                     Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Ankit Singh, Dhirendra Kumar Sharma,
                                                                     Krishna Madhav Shukla, Pramod
                                                                     Kumar Singh, Prince Singh
                                     Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Niyaj Ahmad

                                    Court No. - 23
                                                         HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.

                                    Case called out in the revised list.

                                    The matter pertains to the year 2021.

                                    None is present on behalf of the applicants nor any request for
                                    adjournment or pass over has been made. However, learned AGA is
                                    present.

                                    In view of above, this application is dismissed for non prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                                            (Rajeev Bharti,J.)
                                    December 5, 2025
                                    Shravan




Digitally signed by :-
SHRAVAN KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.