Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KAILASH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The application under Section 482 is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners Kailash and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. No counsel appeared for either side, though the Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court observed that the petitioners appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the matter and that continuing the application would serve no useful purpose. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that had been in force. The order was directed to be sent to the concerned trial court immediately.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when an application under Section 482 remains unprosecuted for an extended period?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 482
  • inherent powers of High Court
  • want of prosecution
  • application dismissal
  • procedural default

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                      APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7060 of 2019

                                    Kailash And Another
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)            :   Rajesh Kumar, Ram Sharan Giri
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)       :   G.A., Mahendra Tripathi

                                    Court No. - 83
                                                      HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.

                                    1. Case called out in the revised list. None is present on behalf of either of
                                    the. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.

                                    2. This application is pending since 2019.

                                    3. It appears that the applicants have lost interest to pursue the case, hence
                                    no useful purpose would be served to keep this application pending.

                                    4. In view of above, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial court forthwith.



                                                                                           (Chawan Prakash,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    Md Faisal




Digitally signed by :-
MOHD FAISAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.