Allahabad High Court
MR. SRINIVASAN A.versusBHARAT ECOFUELS PRIVATE LIMITED
- Decided
- Bench
- PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Holding
The application under Section 11(4) is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Mr. Srinivasan A., filed an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the appointment of an arbitrator. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the applicant or the opposite party, Bharat Ecofuels Private Limited, on the date of hearing. The court observed that the matter had not been prosecuted. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been earlier granted was vacated.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is not prosecuted?
Legislation cited
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11(4)
Subjects
- Arbitration
- Section 11(4)
- Want of prosecution
- Interim order vacated
- Dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. - 150 of 2026
Mr. Srinivasan A.
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Bharat Ecofuels Private Limited
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Krishna Kumar Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.
1. List is revised.
2. Nobody is present on behalf of either side.
3. The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Piyush Agrawal,J.)
September 14, 2026
Abhishek Gupta
Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK GUPTA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…