Allahabad High Court
ANILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Anil, filed a second criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 12027 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court after his first bail application had been dismissed. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted the lack of prosecution evidence and, invoking the principle of want of prosecution, dismissed the second bail application. The judgment was delivered by Justice Jitendra Kumar Sinha on March 19, 2026. No further orders were made.
Issues considered
- Whether the second bail application should be entertained despite the dismissal of the first application
- Whether the lack of prosecution evidence justifies dismissal of the bail application
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- want of prosecution
- second application
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12027 of 2023
Anil
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Sharma, Sarvajeet Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 72
HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to
press this bail application, however, Shri Chandra Shekhar Saran, learned
AGA for the State is present.
2. This is the second bail application filed on behalf of the applicant.
However, his first bail application had been dismissed.
3. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)
March 19, 2026
Rama Kant
Digitally signed by :-
RAMA KANT
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…