Allahabad High Court
MANOJversusSTATE OF U.P.
- Decided
Holding
The court held that the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Summary
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Manoj, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, was already on bail in two other related cases, and had a criminal history involving four other matters, three of which were under notice under Section 41‑A of the Cr.P.C. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the offences and the applicant’s pending cases. After reviewing the record, the court, without expressing an opinion on the merits, found the circumstances suitable for bail and ordered release on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, imposing standard conditions to prevent tampering or intimidation of witnesses. The order expressly limited its effect to the bail application and did not prejudice the trial court’s future findings.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a case instituted under the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act
- Whether the applicant’s criminal history and pending notices under Section 41‑A Cr.P.C. justify denial of bail
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
- U.P. Gangster Act
- Criminal Procedure Code
- false implication
- sureties
- court conditions
- trial pendency
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14206 of 2026
Manoj
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anand Pati Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.
2. Heard Shri Anand Pati Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri
B.P. Singh, learned AGA for the State- respondents and perused the record.
3. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik
Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicant, with a prayer
to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 214 of 2026, under Section 2/3 of
U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, registered at
Police Station Khurja Nagar, District Bulandshahr, during pendency of the
trial.
4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant
is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further
submitted that the applicant is on bail in both the cases that have been shown
against him in the gang chart, apart from the above, the applicant is having
criminal history of four cases and out of four other cases, he is on bail in one
case and remaining three other cases, he has been served a notice under
Section 41-A Cr.P.C. The applicant is languishing in jail since 31.03.2026,
undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been
pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is
no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial.
5. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
6. Applicant is on bail in both the cases that have been shown against him in
the gang chart, apart from the above, the applicant is having criminal history
of four cases and out of four other cases, he is on bail in one case and
BAIL No. 14206 of 2026
2
remaining three other cases, he has been served a notice under Section 41-A
Cr.P.C. The applicant is languishing in jail since 31.03.2026.
7. Upon considering the totality of facts, nature and the evidence reflected
from record and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find
it to be a fit case for bail. Hence, the present bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant- Manoj involved in the aforesaid case crime shall be
released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two
sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned :-
(i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat,
or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to
dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer
or tamper with the evidence.
(ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on
the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii)
recording of statement under Section 351 of B.N.S.S.
(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek
any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are
present in the trial court.
(v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date
fixed, either personally or through his counsel.
9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for
cancellation of bail.
10. It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of
determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an
expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free
to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led
unaffected by anything said in this order.
May 6, 2026
RKM
(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…