Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

PREMversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

A second anticipatory bail application is dismissed when the earlier application has already been rejected and no new material is presented.

Summary

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 84 of 2019) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 376-D and 506, Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, and Section 3(2) of the SC/ST Act. This was the second bail application filed; the first had already been rejected on its merits. No counsel appeared for either party, though the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court noted that the earlier bail application had been dismissed and, finding no new material, dismissed the present application for want of prosecution. Consequently, the applicant was not granted anticipatory bail.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of a second anticipatory bail application when the first has been rejected on merits?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • IPC
  • PCSO Act
  • SC/ST Act
  • bail application
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                             CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14838 of 2020

                                    Prem
                                                                                                  .....Applicant(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P.And Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Ashutosh Yadav, Kamlendra Tripathi,
                                                                    Shyam Lal
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shyam Sunder, Sunil Vashisth

                                    Court No. - 72
                                                     HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

                                    1. List has been revised. No one appear either on behalf of the applicant or
                                    on behalf of the first informant.

                                    2. Shri Chandra Shekhar Saran, learned AGA for the State is present.

                                    3. The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case
                                    Crime no.84 of 2019, under Sections 376-D, 506 of I.P.C. and Section 4 of
                                    Protection of Children from the Sexual Offences and Section 3(2) 5 of
                                    SC/ST Act, Police Station Pahasu, District Bulandshahr, with the prayer that
                                    in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

                                    4. This is the second bail application filed on behalf of the applicant, and
                                    the first bail application has already been rejected by this Court on merits.

                                    5. In view of the above, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.



                                                                                      (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    RKM




Digitally signed by :-
RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.