Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

HARSHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Decided

Holding

The second bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The applicant filed a second criminal bail application in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear before the court despite being listed. The counsel for the applicant also did not appear to argue the application. The court observed that the applicant seemed uninterested in pursuing the bail. Consequently, the court dismissed the second bail application on the ground of want of prosecution. No merits of the bail request were examined as the procedural requirement of appearing was not fulfilled.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bail application can be entertained when the applicant fails to appear before the court
  • Whether dismissal for want of prosecution is appropriate in such circumstances

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • want of prosecution
  • non-appearance
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                             CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15204 of 2025

                                    Harsh
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State of U.P.
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Ashutosh Dwivedi, Gyanendra Kumar
                                                                    Singh
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 91
                                                        HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J.

                                    1. None for the applicant despite taking the case in revised list.

                                    2. On previous date also, no one has appeared on behalf of the applicant
                                    to press this second bail application.

                                    3. It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the second bail
                                    application.

                                    4. In view of the aforesaid fact, the second bail application is dismissed
                                    for want of prosecution.



                                                                                             (Raj Beer Singh,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Gss




Digitally signed by :-
GIRAJA SHANKER SHARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.