Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DHARMENDRA @ PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Decided

Holding

The bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had already been acquitted.

Summary

The applicant, Dharmendra @ Pappu, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 206 of 1997) involving IPC sections 364A, 511 and 394. The trial court had already concluded the trial and acquitted the applicant on 27 January 2026. The High Court, after receiving a report confirming the acquittal, examined whether the bail application could still be entertained. It held that since the applicant had been acquitted, the bail application was no longer relevant. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bail application can be entertained after the accused has been acquitted by the trial court?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • acquittal
  • criminal procedure
  • IPC
  • High Court
  • infructuous application

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                             CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16157 of 2025

                                    Dharmendra @ Pappu
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State of U.P.
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                     :   Prabhat Kumar Pandey
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 64
                                                          HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.

                                    Case called out in the revised list. Counsel for the applicant is not present.

                                    This second bail application has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the
                                    applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 206 of 1997, under Sections 364A,
                                    511, 394 I.P.C., Police Station Kayamganj, District Farrukhabad during
                                    pendency of the trial.

                                    In compliance with the direction of this Court, the Incharge Special
                                    Judge, Dacoity Affected Area/ Additional Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad
                                    has sent his report dated 14.8.2026, according to which the trial in the
                                    aforesaid case has been concluded and the applicant has been acquitted by
                                    the trial Court vide judgment and order dated 27.1.2026.

                                    In view of the said fact, the present bail application stands dismissed as
                                    infructuous.

                                    Sri N.K. Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.


                                                                                               (Vivek Varma,J.)
                                    September 17, 2026
                                    S.S.




Digitally signed by :-
SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.