Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SURESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Decided

Holding

The bail application was dismissed as infructuous since the trial had already been concluded.

Summary

Suresh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 17334 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court, seeking release pending trial. The applicant's counsel, Raj Kumar Khanna and Sandal Khanna, informed the court that the trial had already been concluded, rendering the bail application moot. The court considered whether a bail application could proceed after the conclusion of the trial. Finding that the purpose of bail—to secure liberty pending trial—was no longer applicable, the court held the application to be infructuous. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • The bail application is infructuous because the trial has already concluded.

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • infructuous application
  • trial concluded
  • high court

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                    CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17334 of 2025

                                    Suresh Kumar
                                                                                                .....Applicant(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State of U.P.
                                                                                                   .....Opposite
                                                                                                         Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)             : Raj Kumar Khanna, Sandal Khanna
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)        : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 9
                                                        HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. Sri Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sandal Khanna,
                                    learned counsel for the applicant states that bail application has become
                                    infructuous as the trial has already been concluded.

                                    2. In view of statement so made, the bail application stands dismissed as
                                    infructuous.



                                                                                      (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    April 23, 2026
                                    (V. S. SINGH)




Digitally signed by :-
VIDYA SAGAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.