Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

TAZIM @ IMRANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Decided

Holding

The court held that the applicant is entitled to bail.

Summary

The applicant, Tazim @ Imran, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were based on police rivalry and that he is not a gang member. He had been in custody since June 21, 2026, and claimed that he had previously secured bail in three related cases shown in a gang chart. The State opposed the bail, arguing that the applicant posed a risk given his criminal history of eight cases. The court examined the affidavit, the material on record, and the submissions of counsel without delving into the merits of the underlying criminal allegations. Finding that, on a prima facie basis, the applicant had satisfied the criteria for bail, the court ordered his release on personal bond and two sureties with standard conditions. The order emphasized that any breach of conditions would lead to cancellation of bail and would not affect the trial on merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, considering alleged false implication and prior criminal history.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • U.P. Gangster Act
  • false implication
  • criminal procedure
  • sureties
  • pre‑trial liberty

Judgment

            HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
           CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25565 of 2026

Tazim @ Imran
                                                                .....Applicant(s)
                                     Versus

State of U.P.
                                                                    .....Opposite
                                                                          Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)                       :   Sunil Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                  :   G.A.

Court No. - 68
(Sr. No.124 out of 185)

                          HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

1. List has been revised. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for
the applicant is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri
Deepak Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material
placed on record.

3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case
Crime No.197 of 2026, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social
Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Khatauli, District-
Muzaffarnagar, during the pendency of trial.

4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution
under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the
basis of three criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which he has already
been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The details of criminal cases
have been mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He
has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is
not the member of any gang. Learned counsel has further stated that there is
a criminal history of eight cases against the applicant, which has been
explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 21.6.2026. In case, the
applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

5. On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
                                                                                              BAIL No. 25565 of 2026
                                                                      2


                                    6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by
                                    learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and without
                                    expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of
                                    the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application
                                    is allowed.

                                    7. Let the applicant- Tazim @ Imran, be released on bail in the
                                    aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to
                                    the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties,
                                    with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate
                                    witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.

                                    8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations
                                    herein shall not affect the trial on merits.



                                                                                               (Krishan Pahal,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Vikas Verma




Digitally signed by :-
VIKAS VERMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.