Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AALIM ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Decided

Holding

The bail application is allowed, and the applicant is released on bail subject to conditions.

Summary

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aalim Ali, who was in custody since 8 July 2026 for offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, with an earlier FIR under Section 409 later dropped. The applicant claimed false implication, asserted that no honorarium was received, and highlighted his prior criminal history, which he explained in the application. The State opposed bail but did not contest the applicant’s factual contentions. After reviewing the record and the nature of the allegations, the Court, without expressing an opinion on the merits, found the case suitable for bail and imposed standard conditions. Consequently, the Court ordered the applicant’s release on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties, subject to conditions of appearance, non‑interference with witnesses, and abstention from criminal activity.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, considering the alleged false implication and the applicant’s prior criminal history.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Section 420
  • Section 465
  • Section 467
  • Section 468
  • Section 471
  • false implication
  • criminal history
  • court conditions

Judgment

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
         CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26680 of 2026

Aalim Ali
                                                             .....Applicant(s)
                                   Versus

State of U.P.
                                                                 .....Opposite
                                                                       Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)                 :   Rajendra Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)            :   G.A.

Court No. - 70
                 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused
the record.

2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant
on bail in Case Crime No. 0057 of 2025, under Sections 420, 465, 467,
468, 471 IPC, Police Station Jeanpur District Azamgarh, during pendency
of the trial.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant
has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that no
amount whatsoever has been credited as honorarium. It is further
submitted that initially, the F.I.R. was lodged under Section 409 I.P.C.
also, however, after investigation Section 409 I.P.C. has been dropped. It
is submitted that the applicant has criminal history of the three case,
which has been duly explained in the bail application as well as
supplementary affidavit. The applicant is in jail since 08.07.2026.
Therefore, the applicant is entitled for bail. Learned counsel for the
applicant has further submitted that if the applicant is released on bail, the
applicant would not misuse liberty of bail and is ready to co-operate in the
trial.

4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he has not disputed
the above contention made by the learned counsel for the accused-
applicant.
                                                                                            BAIL No. 26680 of 2026
                                                                   2


                                    5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the
                                    record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced
                                    by the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion
                                    on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail.
                                    Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

                                    6. Let applicant -Aalim Ali be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime
                                    number on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the
                                    like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following
                                    conditions, which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

                                    (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed,
                                    unless his personal presence is exempted.

                                    (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat
                                    or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to
                                    dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer
                                    or tamper with the evidence.

                                    (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social
                                    activity.

                                    7. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be
                                    at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the
                                    bail of the applicant.

                                    8. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts
                                    brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and
                                    the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case
                                    during trial.



                                                                                        (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.)
                                    September 29, 2026
                                    S.K.




Digitally signed by :-
SWEETY KANOJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.