Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHAHNAWAZversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

Since the applicant has been acquitted in the case, the bail application has become infructuous and is dismissed as such.

Summary

Shahnawaz filed Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29178 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel submitted that the applicant had already been acquitted in the underlying case, rendering the bail application infructuous. The Court heard the applicant's counsel and the Additional Government Advocate and perused the record. The Court accepted the submission that no useful purpose would be served by pressing the bail application. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as having become infructuous. No adjudication on the merits of the bail plea was undertaken. The order was passed by Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J. on March 19, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the bail application has become infructuous due to the applicant's acquittal in the underlying case?
  • Whether any relief can be granted in the bail application when the applicant has already been acquitted?

Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Bail
  • Infructuous
  • Acquittal
  • Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application

Judgment

                                                                                                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                                                                                   CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29178 of 2024

                                                                                                                       Shahnawaz
                                                                                                                                                                                            .....Applicant(s)
                                                                                                                                                                  Versus

                                                                                                                       State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                                                                                                                  .....Opposite
                                                                                                                                                                                                        Party(s)

                                                                                                                       Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Abhishek Tripathi, Akhilesh Kumar
                                                                                                                                                       Mishra, Kalpana Singh, Mintu Kumar,
                                                                                                                                                       Ved Prakash Tripathi
                                                                                                                       Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

                                                                                                                       Court No. - 65
                                                                                                                                        HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

                                                                                                                       आवेदक            नअ व          क ना       ह एवं     न अपर शास य अ व          को सुना एवं
                                                                                                                       प वली का प शीलन         या।

                                                                                                                       आवेदक के         नअ व         का कथन है      आवेदक को इस माम       दोषमु      या जा चुका
                                                                                                                       है। इस ए आवेदन प              भावी हो गया है। अतः इस पर कोई बल न देना चाहते है।

                                                                                                                       त सार, यह जमानत आवेदन प                भावी हो जाने एवं इस पर कोई बल न देने कारण     र
                                                                                                                          या जाता है।



                                                                                                                                                                             (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
                                                                                                                       March 19, 2026
                                                                                                                       CP.sahani
             की
                   वि
                       द्वा
                               धि
                                         क्ता
                                                ल्प
                                                           सिं
                                                                      वि
                                                                       द्वा
                                                                              की
                                                                                          धि
                                                                                                क्ता
 त्र
                   रि
                               कि
                  वि
                   द्वा
                              धि
                                    क्ता
                                                                 कि
                                                                              लें
                                                                                    में
                                                                                               क्त
                                                                                                       कि
        लि
                              त्र
                                    नि
                                      ष्प्र
                                                                                    हीं
 द्नु
                                                त्र
                                                      नि
                                                       ष्प्र
                                                                                                            नि
                                                                                                                 स्त
कि
                                                                  Digitally signed by :-
                                                                  CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI
                                                                  High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.