Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DABLU SAROJ @ ALOK SAROJ AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

Decided

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 33448 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant requested that the application be dismissed as not pressed. Neither the informant's counsel nor the Additional Government Advocate opposed this request. The court, noting the lack of opposition, dismissed the anticipatory bail application on the ground that it was not pressed. No substantive discussion on the merits of the bail request was undertaken.

Issues considered

  • Whether the anticipatory bail application is pressed and should be entertained

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • bail application
  • not pressed

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33448 of 2026

                                    Dablu Saroj @ Alok Saroj And 2 Others
                                                                                               .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State of U.P.
                                                                                                  .....Opposite
                                                                                                        Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Vivek Kumar Singh
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Amit Kumar, G.A., Sanjay Kumar
                                                                    Rajbhar

                                    Court No. - 72
                                                     HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

                                    1. Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sanjay
                                    Kumar Rajbhar, learned counsel for the informant, and learned A.G.A. for
                                    the State are present.

                                    2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the applicant prays that the
                                    present application be dismissed as not pressed.

                                    3. The prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant has not been
                                    opposed by the learned counsel for the informant as well as the learned
                                    A.G.A.

                                    4. In view of the above, the present anticipatory bail application is
                                    dismissed as not pressed.



                                                                                      (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.)
                                    September 28, 2026
                                    Radhika




Digitally signed by :-
RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.