Allahabad High Court
YUVRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.
- Decided
- Bench
- KRISHAN PAHAL
Holding
Bail was granted to the applicant on the condition of a personal bond and two sureties, subject to standard bail conditions.
Summary
Yuvraj Singh applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 144 of 2026, charged under several sections of the BNS and the Arms Act. The applicant had no prior criminal record, and a co-accused, Sarvesh @ Rahul Singh, had already been granted bail in a similar case. The court examined the material on record, the submissions of counsel, and the principle of parity with the co-accused. Finding that the applicant satisfied the criteria for bail, the court ordered his release on a personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions not to tamper with evidence, intimidate witnesses, and to appear as required. The bail may be cancelled if any condition is breached, and the trial on merits will continue unaffected.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the applicant during the pendency of trial on the charges under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1), 61(2) of the BNS and Sections 3, 25, 27 of the Arms Act.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- parity
- co-accused
- Arms Act
- sureties
- personal bond
- trial
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34147 of 2026
Yuvraj Singh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Karunesh Pratap Singh, Shivam Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 68
(Sl. No. 23 out of 109)
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
1. List has been revised. Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for
the applicant is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Karunesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.K.S.
Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the material placed on record.
3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 144 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 352,
351(3), 109(1), 61(2) of BNS and 3/25/27 of Arms Act, Police Station - Ramgarh Tal,
District - Gorakhpur, during the pendency of trial.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by
learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration
that similarly placed co-accused person, Sarvesh @ Rahul Singh, has already been
enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 29.07.2026 passed in Criminal Misc.
Bail Application No. 17025 of 2026 coupled with the fact that the applicant has no
criminal history, this Court prima facie is of the view that the applicant has made out a
case for bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. Let the
applicant- Yuvraj Singh, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two
sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties,
with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and
shall appear before the trial court as required.
6. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein
shall not affect the trial on merits.
September 24, 2026
Siddhant
(Krishan Pahal,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SIDDHANT SAHU
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…