Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

CHANDANIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Decided

Holding

The bail application is dismissed as infructuous because the applicant has been acquitted.

Summary

The applicant, Chandani, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 40152 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been acquitted, making the bail application unnecessary. The State of U.P., as the opposite party, raised no objection to this submission. The court noted the acquittal and the lack of any objection and consequently dismissed the bail application as infructuous. The order was pronounced by Justice Krishan Pahal on 19 March 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bail application remains viable after the applicant has been acquitted

Subjects

  • bail
  • acquittal
  • dismissal
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40152 of 2025

                                    Chandani
                                                                                                .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State of U.P.
                                                                                                   .....Opposite
                                                                                                         Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                   :   Danish, Rajiv Sisodia
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)              :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 66
                                                        HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

                                    1. Sri Shashank Dwivedi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rajiv Sisodia,
                                    learned counsel for the applicant states that this application has rendered
                                    infructuous as the applicant has been acquitted, hence, it may be
                                    dismissed as infructuous.

                                    2. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid request.

                                    3. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as infructuous.



                                                                                            (Krishan Pahal,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Siddhant




Digitally signed by :-
SIDDHANT SAHU
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.