Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

PRADEEP SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA

Decided

Holding

The court rejected the third bail application, finding the accused not eligible for bail due to the grave nature of the offence and the massive quantity of narcotics involved.

Summary

The High Court considered the third bail application filed by Pradeep Singh, who is charged under Sections 8, 20, 27A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 975 kg of ganja valued at over Rs. 42 crore. The applicant contended that the seizure was illegal, that no narcotics were recovered from his personal possession, and that he posed no flight risk. The Narcotics Control Bureau countered that the seizure followed due procedure and emphasized the massive quantity and its detrimental social impact. After weighing the arguments, the Court held that the gravity of the offence and the potential harm to society outweighed the applicant's claims, and therefore denied bail. The trial was directed to proceed expeditiously, and the order was limited to the bail application without prejudice to the merits of the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether the seizure of the narcotic substance complied with the procedural requirements of the NDPS Act.
  • Whether the accused is eligible for bail given the large quantity of ganja involved and its social impact.
  • Whether the accused poses a risk of flight or tampering with evidence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • narcotics seizure
  • large quantity offence
  • social impact
  • procedural compliance

Judgment

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
     CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40344 of 2024

Pradeep Singh
                                                            .....Applicant(s)
                                  Versus
Union of India
                                                               .....Opposite
                                                                     Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Ajai Kumar (Senior Advocate), Avanish
                                Kumar Agnihotri, Ayodhya Prasad
                                Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ashish Pandey

Court No. - 19
                     HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned
counsel appearing for Narcotics Control Bureau and perused the material
available on record.

2. This is the third bail application moved on behalf of the
accused/applicant- Pradeep Singh for grant of bail in Case Crime No. 19
of 2021, under Sections 8, 20, 27A, 29 of N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station
Lucknow N.C.B., District Lucknow, during the pendency of trial, as his
first and second bail applications were rejected vide orders dated
27.7.2023 and 20.9.2024, respectively.

3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant, while pressing this third bail
application on behalf of accused-applicant, submits that the accused-
applicant has falsely been implicated in this case and it is further
submitted that while the seizure was conducted, the concerned authorities
did not follow the procedure prescribed in the act and the said seizure is a
sham exercise in the absence of the procedure, as prescribed under the act
and the law settled on the subject, the arrest of the applicant/accused
becomes illegal.

4. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the
personal possession of the applicant and he was just found sitting in the
alleged vehicle. He is languishing in jail since 30.5.2021 and criminal
history of one case has been explained and applicant is bailed out in that
case and there is no apprehension that, after being released on bail, he
may flee from the course of law or may otherwise misuse the liberty.

5. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Narcotics Control
                                                                                           BAIL No. 40344 of 2024
                                                                   2

                                    Bureau submits that the quantity of Ganja, which has been recovered from
                                    the possession of the accused applicant is 975 KG, market value of which
                                    is more than Rs. 42 crores and further submits that, the accused /
                                    applicant is not liable to be enlarged on bail. The concerned officials have
                                    followed due procedure of law, while seizing the Ganja and arresting the
                                    accused.

                                    6. Having considered the rival contentions and the fact that, a huge
                                    quantity of ganja, i.e., 975 KG has been recovered from the possession of
                                    the accused and the market value of the same is stated to be more than Rs.
                                    42 crores. Even if the value of the narcotic substance is not considered,
                                    then the impact of circulation of 975 KG ganja in the society is likely to
                                    spoil the carrier of the youth across the country, wherever it comes into
                                    circulation and is consumed. Therefore, it is beyond the category of
                                    economic offence, as such, it has twin impacts; first of all it promotes
                                    illegal earning of money, i.e., having unlawful pecuniary gain by the
                                    persons, who are engaged in such illegal trade and business, secondly, it
                                    destroys the very fabric of the society, when a youth, either studying or
                                    preparing to secure job or running a business, comes in the contact of
                                    such persons and consumes such items, such as. Ganja, then the same
                                    results in destroying the family at large and consumption of narcotic
                                    substance is a bane on the society. By all means, it is to be reduced and
                                    minimized to the maximum extent, wherein the State is taking all such
                                    steps to minimize the illegal use, trade and consumption of such
                                    substance. Therefore, having considered the economic and social aspects
                                    and the gravity of the crime, its impact on the society, the instant third
                                    bail application moved on behalf of accused / applicant Pradeep Singh is
                                    hereby rejected.

                                    7. However, the trial court is directed to proceed with the trial and make
                                    all out efforts to conclude the same within a reasonable period.

                                    8. Observations made herein-above by this court are only for the purpose
                                    of disposal of this bail application and shall not be construed as an
                                    expression of this Court on the merits of the case.

                                    9. Office is directed to send a copy of the instant order to the trial court
                                    concerned.

                                    February 26, 2026
                                    Gurpreet Singh
                                                                                             (Harvir Singh,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
GURPREET SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.