Allahabad High Court
VIJAYPALversusSTATE OF U.P.
- Decided
- Bench
- JAI PRAKASH TIWARI
Holding
The Court held that the applicant is entitled to bail and allowed the bail application.
Summary
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vijaypal, who was arrested in a NDNDPS case for alleged possession of 2.94 kg of charas. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false implication, and argued that mandatory provisions of Sections 50 and 52‑A of the NDPS Act were not complied with. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the drug offence. Relying on Section 37 of the NDPS Act and Supreme Court precedents in Nadeem Ahmed v. State of West Bengal (2025) and Union of India v. Shiv Shanker Kesari (2007), the Court found the case fit for bail without commenting on the merits. Consequently, bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and several conditions, with a warning that breach would lead to cancellation.
Issues considered
- Whether the non‑compliance of mandatory provisions of Sections 50 and 52‑A of the NDPS Act warrants denial of bail.
- Whether bail can be granted under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for an offence punishable under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act involving a large quantity of narcotics.
- Whether the Supreme Court decisions in Nadeem Ahmed v. State of West Bengal and Union of India v. Shiv Shanker Kesari are applicable to the present bail application.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 351, 483
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act — s. 20, 37, 50, 52-A, 8
Subjects
- bail
- NDPS Act
- drug possession
- mandatory provisions
- Section 483 B.N.S.S.
- Supreme Court precedent
- trial pendency
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5172 of 2026
Vijaypal
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ved Prakash Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 70
HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
1. The present case has been taken up out of turn under the category of
mention cases.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State-
respondents and perused the record.
3. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik
Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicant with a
prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime 785 of 2025 under Section
8/20 NDPS Act, registered at Police Station- Civil Line, District-
Moradabad during pendency of the trial.
4. It has been argued by the learned counsel' for the applicant that
applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and
he has been languishing in jail since 9.10.2025. It is further submitted that
2.94 kg. of charas is said to have been recovered from the possession of
the applicant and co-accused Hariom. It is further submitted that
mandatory provisions of Sections 50 and 52-A of NDPS Act have not
been complied with. It is also submitted that the applicant undertakes that
he will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It is also submitted that co-
accused Hariom has been released on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this
Court vide order dated 4.5.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail
Application No. 14921 of 2026. It has also been pointed out that in the
wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of
any early conclusion of trial.
BAIL No. 5172 of 2026
2
5. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail to the applicant.
6. As per allegation in the FIR, 2.94 kg. of charas is said to have been
recovered from a schoooty, in which the applicant and the co-accused
were riding and the possession of the applicant and co-accused Vijay Pal
and it is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that mandatory
provisions of Sections 52-A of NDPS Act have not been complied with.
7. Upon considering the totality of facts, nature and the evidence reflected
from record and also taking into consideration the provision of Section 37
of the NDPS Act and in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court
in Nadeem Ahmed vs. State of West Bengal, 2025 LawSuit (SC) 1134
(2025 INSC 993) and in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex
Court in Union of India vs. Shiv Shanker Kesari, 2007 (7) SCC 798
and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a
fit case for bail. Hence, the present bail application is ALLOWED.
8. Let the applicant- Vijaypal involved in the aforesaid case crime be
released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/-with two
sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned
with the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,
threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police
officer or tamper with the evidence.
(ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution
witnesses.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on
the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii)
recording of statement under Section 351 of B.N.S.S.
(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not
seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses
BAIL No. 5172 of 2026
3
are present in the trial court.
(v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date
fixed, either personally or through his counsel.
9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for
cancellation of bail.
10. It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose
of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed
as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be
absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of
evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.
May 7, 2026
KK Patel
(Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
KRISHN KANT PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…