Allahabad High Court
ARVIND KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK VARMA
Holding
The application for cancellation of bail was dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The applicant Arvind Kumar sought cancellation of bail that had been granted to the second opposite party in a criminal case under Sections 109(1), 333 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The bail was originally ordered by the Sessions Judge, Saharanpur on 1 Oct 2025. After hearing, counsel for the applicant, Ajay Kumar, requested that the application be withdrawn. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the bail‑cancellation application. Consequently, the bail remained in force.
Issues considered
- Whether the bail granted to the opposite party should be cancelled
Subjects
- bail cancellation
- criminal procedure
- withdrawal of application
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 149
of 2026
Arvind Kumar
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar, Pawan Kumar Gupta
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. This is an application for cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party
no.2 by the court of Sessions Judge, Saharanpur vide order dated 01.10.2025
passed in Bail Application No. 4491 of 2025 (Mohan Singh vs. State of
U.P.), arising out of Case Crime No.98 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 333,
3(5) B.N.S., Police Station-Teetro, District- Saharanpur.
2. After arguing the matter at some length, Sri Ajay Kumar, counsel for the
applicant prays for withdrawal of the present application.
3. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
May 7, 2026
Manish Kr
(Vivek Varma,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
MANISH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…