Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SANDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The bail cancellation application was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the applicant's absence.

Summary

The applicant filed a bail cancellation application seeking to set aside bail granted to the second accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 172 of 2025). No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue the application, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted the absence of representation for the applicant and held that the application could not be pursued. Consequently, the bail cancellation application was dismissed for non-prosecution. The decision underscores the procedural requirement of having a party or counsel present to press such applications.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bail cancellation application can be entertained and decided when the applicant is not represented before the court

Subjects

  • bail cancellation
  • criminal procedure
  • non-prosecution
  • court procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                    CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 323
                                                            of 2026

                                    Sandeep
                                                                                                    .....Applicant(s)
                                                                         Versus
                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                        .....Opposite
                                                                                                              Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                :   Divyanshi Joshi, Pushpa Joshi
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)           :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 65
                                                            HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.

                                    1. This is bail cancellation application filed on behalf of applicant.

                                    2. Case called out in revised list. None is present on behalf of applicant to
                                    press the instant bail cancellation application. Sri Imran Khan, learned AGA
                                    for the State is present.

                                    3. The instant bail cancellation application has been filed by the applicant
                                    with a prayer to cancel the bail granted to opposite party no.2 in Case Crime
                                    No. 172 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 3(5) BNS, Police Station Badgaon,
                                    District Saharanpur.

                                    4. Considering the fact that none is present on behalf of applicant to press
                                    the instant bail cancellation application, the instant application stands
                                    dismissed for non prosecution.
                                    October 1, 2026
                                    AK Pandey
                                                                                              (Sameer Jain,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.